ERR12513519

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus faecium

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 6.24 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 135047915 reported

total reads 735584 reported

n content pct 0.115 measured

pct q20 bases 95.8 measured

pct q30 bases 94.4 measured

pct reads q30 95.9 measured

sampled bases 67554351 measured

sampled reads 367792 measured

gc content pct 38 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 74 measured

quality dropoff 3.7 measured

read length max 251 measured

read length min 35 measured

read length n50 250 measured

max base quality 40 measured

mean read length 183.7 measured

max n pct per pos 0.647 measured

mean base quality 36.7 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 19.74 measured

read length median 215 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

median read quality 37.9 measured

duplication rate pct 19.45 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.64 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 19.45 measured ×0.5 64%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 48 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0