← Dataset search
ERR12549945
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Enterococcus faecium
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
0
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
399995415
reported
total reads
2270625
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
99.6
measured
pct q30 bases
99.6
measured
pct reads q30
100
measured
sampled bases
251
measured
sampled reads
1
measured
gc content pct
35.9
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-0.4
measured
read length max
251
measured
read length min
251
measured
read length n50
251
measured
max base quality
40
measured
mean read length
251
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
38.6
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
251
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
38.6
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
overrepresented top pct
100
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
99.6
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0