ERR13472822
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Sponge (Sycon ciliatum) bulk-RNA-seq on HiSeq 1500 with 5.2 million 92 bp reads at 98.7% Q20 and 97% Q30 provides high-quality transcriptome data. The 48.2% GC is consistent with invertebrate genomes; suitable for studying developmental gene expression, regeneration, or evolution in early-branching metazoans.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.