ERR1442653

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Danio rerio

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 350643600 reported

total reads 3506436 reported

n content pct 0.013 measured

pct q20 bases 98 measured

pct q30 bases 93 measured

gc content pct 45.3 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.47 measured

duplication rate pct 22.66 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.3 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.47 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 22.66 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0