ERR1466852

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

70/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Arctia plantaginis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4913068200 reported

total reads 24565341 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 90.9 measured

pct q30 bases 82.1 measured

gc content pct 48.2 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 32.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.16 measured

duplication rate pct 53.88 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 70/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.1 measured ×1 61%

mean base quality 32.9 measured ×0.6 82%

adapter content pct 0.16 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 53.88 measured ×0.4 47%

QC cost 2 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0