ERR1560024

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

69/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

sediment metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 387388786 reported

total reads 6895683 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 98.2 measured

pct q30 bases 96 measured

gc content pct 51.5 measured

mean read length 56.2 measured

mean base quality 36.6 measured

adapter content pct 4.41 measured

duplication rate pct 68.05 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 69/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 68.05 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 4.41 measured ×0.4 76%

QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0