← Dataset search
ERR15665880
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
MinION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
504478057
reported
total reads
26082
reported
mean coverage
109.7
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
63.3
measured
pct q30 bases
20
measured
gc content pct
50.8
measured
mean read length
19050.8
measured
mean base quality
21.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
duplication rate pct
0.1
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
109.7
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
20
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.1
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0