← Dataset search
ERR15665900
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
MinION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
897016841
reported
total reads
101734
reported
mean coverage
195
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
55.5
measured
pct q30 bases
15.3
measured
gc content pct
50.7
measured
mean read length
8722.8
measured
mean base quality
20.3
measured
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
duplication rate pct
0.1
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
195
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
15.3
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.1
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0