ERR15665901

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

68/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Escherichia coli

Instrument

MinION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1174076765 reported

total reads 113708 reported

mean coverage 255.2 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 62.7 measured

pct q30 bases 20.5 measured

gc content pct 50.5 measured

mean read length 10096.4 measured

mean base quality 21.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.11 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 255.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 20.5 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.11 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0