ERR15665907

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

68/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Escherichia coli

Instrument

MinION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 983211609 reported

total reads 98654 reported

mean coverage 213.7 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 65 measured

pct q30 bases 21.5 measured

gc content pct 50.9 measured

mean read length 5381.5 measured

mean base quality 22.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 2.33 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 213.7 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 21.5 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 2.33 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0