ERR1597774

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Bos indicus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3926161385 reported

total reads 24306629 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 97.6 measured

pct q30 bases 91.6 measured

gc content pct 52.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 35.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 31.74 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.7 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 31.74 measured ×0.4 96%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0