ERR173210

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

generic-deposit

Organism

Sus celebensis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Files available

FASTQ

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 49468172940 reported

read count 302911286 reported

parent study PRJEB1683 reported

library layout PAIRED reported

read length bp 163.3 extrapolated

library strategy OTHER reported

checksums present yes reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published generic-deposit thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 100%

read length reported ×0.8 100%

layout paired reported ×0.6 100%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 100%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently