← Dataset search
ERR1918031
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
15177885498
reported
total reads
50257899
reported
mean coverage
5.6
extrapolated
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
97.4
measured
pct q30 bases
94.6
measured
gc content pct
41.6
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
39.7
measured
adapter content pct
3.63
measured
duplication rate pct
14.88
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 55/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
5.6
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
94.6
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
14.88
measured
×0.5
79%
adapter content pct
3.63
measured
×0.4
81%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0