ERR1918062

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

57/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 20613636952 reported

total reads 68257076 reported

mean coverage 7.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 97.2 measured

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured

gc content pct 41.4 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 39.3 measured

adapter content pct 1.8 measured

duplication rate pct 15.53 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 57/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 7.6 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 15.53 measured ×0.5 77%

adapter content pct 1.8 measured ×0.4 94%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0