ERR1995237

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 13.62 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5538359216 reported

total reads 29374550 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 98.3 measured

pct q30 bases 91.8 measured

pct reads q30 94.4 measured

sampled bases 58817181 measured

sampled reads 618315 measured

gc content pct 46.7 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 9.7 measured

quality dropoff 2.1 measured

read length max 98 measured

read length min 30 measured

read length n50 98 measured

max base quality 41 measured

mean read length 95.1 measured

max n pct per pos 0 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 100 measured

read length median 98 measured

adapter content pct 1.1 measured

median read quality 36.6 measured

duplication rate pct 4.12 measured

overrepresented top pct 0 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 4.12 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 1.1 measured ×0.4 99%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0