ERR1995314

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

57/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 10.64 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 128350916 reported

total reads 1572986 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 91.7 measured

pct q30 bases 73.6 measured

pct reads q30 58.2 measured

sampled bases 47276016 measured

sampled reads 590852 measured

gc content pct 51.9 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 20.5 measured

quality dropoff -0.9 measured

read length max 97 measured

read length min 30 measured

read length n50 95 measured

max base quality 41 measured

mean read length 80 measured

max n pct per pos 0.058 measured

mean base quality 31.9 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 100 measured

read length median 93 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

median read quality 31.2 measured

duplication rate pct 0.45 measured

overrepresented top pct 0 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 57/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 73.6 measured ×1 18%

duplication rate pct 0.45 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0