ERR2042063

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

58/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 26.31 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5568055 reported

total reads 14404 reported

n content pct 7.024 measured

pct q20 bases 85.1 measured

pct q30 bases 77.5 measured

pct reads q30 54.4 measured

sampled bases 2766346 measured

sampled reads 14404 measured

gc content pct 50 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 129.4 measured

quality dropoff 0.9 measured

read length max 301 measured

read length min 35 measured

read length n50 301 measured

max base quality 38 measured

mean read length 192.1 measured

max n pct per pos 38.545 measured

mean base quality 31.8 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 40.22 measured

read length median 301 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

median read quality 32.1 measured

duplication rate pct 84.75 measured

overrepresented top pct 38.54 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 58/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 77.5 measured ×1 38%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0