ERR204309

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

39/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

generic-deposit

Organism

gut metagenome

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

LS454

Files available

submitted

Metrics (value · how obtained)

parent study PRJEB1147 reported

library layout SINGLE reported

library strategy POOLCLONE reported

checksums present no reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 5 scored metric(s) → 39/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published generic-deposit thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 0%

layout paired reported ×0.6 40%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 0%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 0%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently