ERR2045145

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 9.68 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 12597408000 reported

total reads 62987040 reported

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 98.5 measured

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured

pct reads q30 96.2 measured

sampled bases 85605700 measured

sampled reads 856057 measured

gc content pct 42 measured

polyg tail pct 0.01 measured

read length sd 0 measured

quality dropoff -1.1 measured

read length max 100 measured

read length min 100 measured

read length n50 100 measured

max base quality 40 measured

mean read length 100 measured

max n pct per pos 0.526 measured

mean base quality 36.9 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 100 measured

adapter content pct 3 measured

median read quality 38 measured

duplication rate pct 2.19 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 2.19 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 3 measured ×0.4 86%

QC cost 45 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0