ERR2061072

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Canis lupus familiaris

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Files available

FASTQ

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 1961415240 reported

read count 24399135 reported

parent study PRJEB22026 reported

library layout SINGLE reported

read length bp 80.4 extrapolated

library strategy WGS reported

checksums present yes reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 0%

read length reported ×0.8 70%

layout paired reported ×0.6 40%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 100%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently