ERR2074057

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Ovis aries

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1100845000 reported

total reads 4403380 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 97.3 measured

pct q30 bases 94.3 measured

gc content pct 50.2 measured

mean read length 125 measured

mean base quality 36.4 measured

adapter content pct 11.28 measured

duplication rate pct 15.9 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.3 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 11.28 measured ×0.4 48%

duplication rate pct 15.9 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0