ERR209146

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

58/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1142475537 reported

total reads 8484851 reported

n content pct 0.028 measured

pct q20 bases 85.1 measured

pct q30 bases 74.2 measured

gc content pct 48.6 measured

mean read length 68.2 measured

mean base quality 33.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 0.45 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 58/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 74.2 measured ×1 21%

duplication rate pct 0.45 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0