ERR225814

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

75/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Polistes canadensis

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1269570600 reported

total reads 31739265 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 98.1 measured

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured

gc content pct 50.7 measured

mean read length 40 measured

mean base quality 37.2 measured

adapter content pct 12.25 measured

duplication rate pct 73 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 75/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 37.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 12.25 measured ×0.4 43%

duplication rate pct 73 measured ×0.4 4%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0