Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mosquito RNA-seq with B grade (83/100) substantially lowered by catastrophic duplication bias (79.67%, scored 0/100), the sole metric that scored zero and overwhelming all else. Exceptional per-base quality (Q30 96.9%, mean 38) is negated by duplication, likely from PCR over-amplification. Unsuitable for expression quantification without computational deduplication.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0