ERR2277398

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

81/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Leptidea sinapis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2482174044 reported

total reads 9849897 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 95.9 measured

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured

gc content pct 54.1 measured

mean read length 126 measured

mean base quality 35.2 measured

adapter content pct 4.9 measured

duplication rate pct 81.7 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 81/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 4.9 measured ×0.4 84%

duplication rate pct 81.7 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 32 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0