Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Honeybee ncRNA-seq with B grade (84/100) substantially limited by high duplication (72.66%, scored 5/100, second highest among RNA datasets), reflecting PCR stress typical in small RNA libraries. Good Q30 (93.2%) and high read count (45.8M) are offset by duplication. Suitable for abundance surveys but not quantitative expression estimates.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0