ERR2497952

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 16920976800 reported

total reads 84604884 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 91.3 measured

gc content pct 47.1 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.94 measured

duplication rate pct 0.5 measured

mean target coverage 272.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 272.9 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 91.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.5 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.94 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0