ERR2749226

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

metagenome

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 8.73 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2371188908 reported

total reads 15504959 reported

n content pct 0.16 measured

pct q20 bases 95.1 measured

pct q30 bases 92.9 measured

pct reads q30 94.6 measured

sampled bases 76390868 measured

sampled reads 1000000 measured

gc content pct 41.4 measured

polyg tail pct 0.02 measured

read length sd 2.6 measured

quality dropoff 1.5 measured

read length max 77 measured

read length min 35 measured

read length n50 77 measured

max base quality 36 measured

mean read length 76.4 measured

max n pct per pos 0.453 measured

mean base quality 34.1 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 100 measured

read length median 77 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

median read quality 34.9 measured

duplication rate pct 2.52 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.35 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 2.52 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0