ERR2752452

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

68/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human WGS (Oxford Nanopore MinION, long-read). Conditional reusability (grade D); evidence_strength is low (0.61) and coverage (63.3x) is extrapolated rather than measured. Very low Q30 (6.3%) is inherent to nanopore technology, not a failure; strong extrapolated coverage is the compensating factor, but deep measured validation is pending.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

MinION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 196088529088 reported

total reads 18688039 reported

mean coverage 63.3 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 24.8 measured

pct q30 bases 6.3 measured

gc content pct 50 measured

mean read length 10818.9 measured

mean base quality 14.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.08 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 63.3 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 6.3 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.08 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0