ERR2755195

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

48/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

BGISEQ-500

Platform

BGISEQ

Files available

submitted

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count -1 reported

read count -1 reported

parent study PRJEB27414 reported

library layout PAIRED reported

read length bp 1 extrapolated

library strategy WGS reported

checksums present no reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 48/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 0%

read length reported ×0.8 0%

layout paired reported ×0.6 100%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 0%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently