ERR2778280

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

59/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus faecium

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 6.89 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 428567927 reported

total reads 1423224 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96 measured

pct q30 bases 93.3 measured

pct reads q30 95.6 measured

sampled bases 98779272 measured

sampled reads 656009 measured

gc content pct 39.8 measured

polyg tail pct 7.11 measured

read length sd 0.7 measured

quality dropoff -0.1 measured

read length max 151 measured

read length min 139 measured

read length n50 151 measured

max base quality 36 measured

mean read length 150.6 measured

max n pct per pos 0.029 measured

mean base quality 34.4 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 151 measured

adapter content pct 25.42 measured

median read quality 35.1 measured

duplication rate pct 32.23 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.03 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 59/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 32.23 measured ×0.5 24%

adapter content pct 25.42 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0