ERR2795059

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

80/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Files available

submitted

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 11590458824 reported

read count 118269988 reported

parent study PRJEB23051 reported

library layout SINGLE reported

read length bp 98 extrapolated

library strategy OTHER reported

checksums present no reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 80/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 100%

read length reported ×0.8 97%

layout paired reported ×0.6 40%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 0%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently