Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human amplicon sequencing (MiSeq). Grade-D marginal (67/100) with poor Q30 (80.1%, scored 50/100) and unusually high N content (2.034%), both measured. Target coverage (2.3x, extrapolated) is critically low and provisional. Inadequate depth and base quality for reliable amplicon analysis; not recommended without substantial re-sequencing.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0