ERR2804199

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Exceptionally deep amplicon dataset (3.7M reads, 82.3% Q30) with exceptional fidelity (0.07% N-content, 93.4% Q20); provides unprecedented depth for rare-variant discovery and sensitive allele frequency quantification.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1853796644 reported

total reads 3692822 reported

n content pct 0.07 measured

pct q20 bases 93.4 measured

pct q30 bases 82.3 measured

gc content pct 54 measured

mean read length 251 measured

mean base quality 32.3 measured

adapter content pct 1.7 measured

duplication rate pct 94.12 measured

mean target coverage 29.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.3 measured ×1 62%

adapter content pct 1.7 measured ×0.5 95%

QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0