ERR2804220

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

32/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Moderate-depth amplicon run (114k reads, 78.6% Q30) with clean amplification (0.004% N-content) but lower quality metrics; limited but serviceable for small-scale studies.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 57456410 reported

total reads 114455 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 83.8 measured

pct q30 bases 78.6 measured

gc content pct 49.3 measured

mean read length 251 measured

mean base quality 32.4 measured

adapter content pct 13.76 measured

duplication rate pct 84.81 measured

mean target coverage 0.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 32/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.6 measured ×1 43%

adapter content pct 13.76 measured ×0.5 9%

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0