ERR2804244

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

60/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Moderate amplicon library (229k reads) with clean amplification but moderate Q30 (80.5%); adequate for standard genotyping applications.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 116749674 reported

total reads 229345 reported

n content pct 0.033 measured

pct q20 bases 88.8 measured

pct q30 bases 80.5 measured

gc content pct 52.9 measured

mean read length 254.5 measured

mean base quality 32.8 measured

adapter content pct 4.31 measured

duplication rate pct 87.94 measured

mean target coverage 1.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 60/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 80.5 measured ×1 53%

adapter content pct 4.31 measured ×0.5 76%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0