Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
MiSeq amplicon sequencing of human genomic DNA produced 508k short reads (255 Mb total) with high sequence quality (85–89% bases at Q20–Q30), suitable for targeted variant calling and allele-frequency analysis in amplicon-enriched regions. The 52% GC content and minimal N-content indicate clean library preparation that supports reliable SNP and small-indel detection in amplicon-based studies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0