ERR2935853

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 1500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1492159456 reported

total reads 7386928 reported

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 78.7 measured

pct q30 bases 69.2 measured

gc content pct 55.8 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 30.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.21 measured

duplication rate pct 7.59 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 69.2 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 7.59 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.21 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0