← Dataset search
ERR2985583
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
36/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Gallus gallus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
13010090940
reported
total reads
51630666
reported
mean coverage
11.8
extrapolated
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
41.5
measured
pct q30 bases
13.7
measured
gc content pct
68.2
measured
mean read length
126
measured
mean base quality
13.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.11
measured
duplication rate pct
0.74
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 36/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
11.8
extrapolated
×1.2
17%
pct q30 bases
13.7
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.74
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.11
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0