← Dataset search
ERR2985630
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Gallus gallus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
33239947390
reported
total reads
164755291
reported
mean coverage
30.2
extrapolated
n content pct
7.031
measured
pct q20 bases
24.5
measured
pct q30 bases
2.6
measured
gc content pct
43
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
8.5
measured
adapter content pct
0.06
measured
duplication rate pct
0.22
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
30.2
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
2.6
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.22
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.06
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0