ERR3004232

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

86/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

High-quality human amplicon library (1.08M reads, 85.7% Q30) with perfect amplification fidelity (0% N-content) and strong Q20 metrics (93.5%); exceptional for sensitive variant discovery.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 661937840 reported

total reads 1085144 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 93.5 measured

pct q30 bases 85.7 measured

gc content pct 57.6 measured

mean read length 325 measured

mean base quality 34.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.52 measured

duplication rate pct 92.79 measured

mean target coverage 10.7 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 86/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85.7 measured ×1 79%

adapter content pct 0.52 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0