Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
56/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of the ant Temnothorax longispinosus yielded 4M reads (808 Mb) with moderate Q30 rate (74.8%) and slightly elevated N-content (0.061%), indicating this dataset will benefit from stricter read filtering for reliable expression quantification. Search terms like 'ant transcriptomics' and 'social insect RNA-seq' apply; the 44.6% GC reflects expected nucleotide composition for hymenopteran genomes.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0