Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq from the fungus-farming ant Acromyrmex echinatior (10.3M reads, 774.8 Mb, 63.4% GC) with good quality (94.8% Q20, 93.2% Q30, 0.001% N). Enables gene expression studies in social insect biology and ant-fungus symbiosis. Ant transcriptomics and NextSeq insect sequencing searches would retrieve this dataset.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0