← Dataset search
ERR3402593
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.77
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
295013834
reported
total reads
1953734
reported
mean coverage
64.1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
96.8
measured
pct q30 bases
91.6
measured
pct reads q30
95.5
measured
sampled bases
84959697
measured
sampled reads
562647
measured
gc content pct
47.5
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-1
measured
read length max
151
measured
read length min
151
measured
read length n50
151
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
151
measured
max n pct per pos
0.707
measured
mean base quality
38.1
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
151
measured
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
median read quality
39.7
measured
duplication rate pct
4.63
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.04
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
64.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
91.6
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
4.63
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0