ERR3402635

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus faecalis

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 5.89 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 304885610 reported

total reads 2019110 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 97 measured

pct q30 bases 92.4 measured

pct reads q30 96.1 measured

sampled bases 87684039 measured

sampled reads 580689 measured

gc content pct 37.5 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 0 measured

quality dropoff -0.8 measured

read length max 151 measured

read length min 151 measured

read length n50 151 measured

max base quality 41 measured

mean read length 151 measured

max n pct per pos 0.77 measured

mean base quality 38.3 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 151 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

median read quality 39.9 measured

duplication rate pct 9.39 measured

overrepresented top pct 0.03 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 9.39 measured ×0.5 96%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0