ERR345433

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

57/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

ILLUMINA

Files available

FASTQ

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 251 reported

read count 3 reported

parent study PRJEB4631 reported

library layout SINGLE reported

read length bp 83.7 extrapolated

library strategy AMPLICON reported

checksums present yes reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 57/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 0%

read length reported ×0.8 75%

layout paired reported ×0.6 40%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 100%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 0%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently