← Dataset search
ERR3640756
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
7776719800
reported
total reads
38883599
reported
n content pct
0.033
measured
pct q20 bases
98.5
measured
pct q30 bases
97.4
measured
gc content pct
48.5
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
38.4
measured
adapter content pct
0.21
measured
duplication rate pct
0.44
measured
mean target coverage
125.4
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
125.4
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
97.4
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0.44
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.21
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0