ERR3653901

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk-RNA-seq on NovaSeq 6000 for Bemisia tabaci with good quality (97.8% Q20, 93.9% Q30) and elevated N-content (0.019%). Whitefly dataset slightly lower quality than perfect replicates but suitable for expression analysis in this agricultural pest.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Bemisia tabaci

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 8467964648 reported

total reads 29608268 reported

n content pct 0.019 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured

gc content pct 39.8 measured

mean read length 143 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

adapter content pct 1.32 measured

duplication rate pct 31.87 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 1.32 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 31.87 measured ×0.4 96%

QC cost 36 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0