← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Nepenthes vieillardii
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1050235800
reported
total reads
3500786
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
94.6
measured
pct q30 bases
89.3
measured
gc content pct
48.6
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
37.4
measured
adapter content pct
76.68
measured
duplication rate pct
24.82
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 67/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.3
measured
×1
97%
duplication rate pct
24.82
measured
×0.5
61%
adapter content pct
76.68
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
44 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0