ERR3672064

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

62/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS on MiSeq for Nepenthes ventricosa (carnivorous pitcher plant) with good quality (90.9% Q20, 83.7% Q30) but low read-count coverage (195,459 reads). Shallow whole-genome sequencing provides draft-level assembly; useful for large-scaffold assembly and synteny comparisons but insufficient for comprehensive variant calling.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Nepenthes ventricosa

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 117666318 reported

total reads 195459 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 90.9 measured

pct q30 bases 83.7 measured

gc content pct 46.8 measured

mean read length 301 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 47.81 measured

duplication rate pct 4.7 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 62/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.7 measured ×1 69%

duplication rate pct 4.7 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 47.81 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0